Senate compromise could slash license requirements for barbers, cosmetology specialists

Negotiations with House may mean reduction in license requirements.

A last-minute change to a deregulation bill could mean lower licensing requirements for certain professionals in cosmetic fields.

A strike-all amendment in the works for Florida Senate bill (SB 1640) will bring the legislation in line with a House version (HB 27), multiple sources say.

That means lowering requirements for barbers and certain cosmetology specialists.

The House version, sponsored by Spring Hill Rep. Blaise Ingoglia, cuts requirements for Florida barbers to need just 600 hours of training, as opposed to 1,200 required hours now. That would be the lowest requirement of any state in the union.

Meanwhile, cosmetology specialists like nail techs and skin care professions must go through 500 hours of training now, but the House bill cuts that down to 300 hours.

The Senate version from Bartow Sen. Ben Albritton keeps requirements in both fields at current levels.

Multiple sources say the change will morph the Senate bill into something much closer, but not identical to, the House version. They will add barber and cosmetology changes into the proposal.

Michael Halmon of the Florida Association of Cosmetology and Technical Schools said while it sounds as if lowering licensing rules will help professionals, it is unlikely.

First, the drop in hours for cosmetology specialists puts education needs so low students can’t qualify for federal Pell grants.

“The vast majority of students are using Pell grants to go to school,” Halmon said.

But even if students find a way to pay, the low amount of training may leave them unemployable after they graduate.

Dan Washburn, the owner of 31 Great Clips locations, testified in House committee earlier this session that requirements in Florida are already too low.

“We have great jobs and are always in need of more talent,” he said. “But this will exacerbate a problem.”

Should the number of hours required be cut in half, it may mean the company turns to other states to train barbers and stylists.

None of that gets into public safety concerns that may come from putting chemicals and cutting tools in the hands of undertrained professionals.

Of course, no strike-all amendment is yet available. Officials working with Albritton’s bill confirm an amendment in the works seeks to strike a compromise with the House. But Senate officials say the bill won’t mimic every aspect of the House legislation.

The soonest any amendment will be viewable will be Friday.

Proponents of the House version suggest too many regulations will hurt access to good-paying vocational jobs.

But those who favor the Senate version see that chamber caving to House demands after months of committee negotiations on the bill.

Jacob Ogles

Jacob Ogles has covered politics in Florida since 2000 for regional outlets including SRQ Magazine in Sarasota, The News-Press in Fort Myers and The Daily Commercial in Leesburg. His work has appeared nationally in The Advocate, Wired and other publications. Events like SRQ’s Where The Votes Are workshops made Ogles one of Southwest Florida’s most respected political analysts, and outlets like WWSB ABC 7 and WSRQ Sarasota have featured his insights. He can be reached at [email protected]


  • Larry Gillis, Executive Committee, Libertarian Party of Florida

    April 25, 2019 at 6:06 pm

    Let the market decide. Your passing reference to “chemicals” is the journalistic equivalent of a drive-by shooting, and is at a considerable remove from the realities of the marketplace. This stuff is not rocket science, and brutal schooling requirements are a sneaky way of stifling competition from new entrants in the market. BTW, how about some schooling requirements for journalists, who are vastly more dangerous to us in the long run?

    • Dr. Maura Scali-Sheahan

      April 25, 2019 at 7:41 pm

      And just how is the “market” to decide, Mr. Gillis – the trial and error method? Will consumers even know who to complain to if they’re injured from a sharp tool, end up with a staph infection, or sustain a chemical burn from substances that can literally dissolve hair? When was the last time you sat in on a barber or cosmetology class to have arrived at such a conclusion?
      Now, to your other justifications for this profession-killing bill…a)Florida education & training hour requirements, minimal as they are and some of the lowest in the country, are not brutal…they are stepping stones to success that signify a level of achievement (kind of like a law degree) and something more than a participation trophy; b)you insult every licensed occupation and licensee by equating their support for legitimate requirements as some nefarious attempt to stifle competition…is this assertion backed up with hard data or simply an opinion? FYI, neither state boards, nor licensees have the authority to limit the number of licenses issued; in fact, “restrictions should be imposed only to the extent necessary to protect the public from recognized dangers and in a manner which will not unreasonably affect the competitive market” (Chapter 476 Barbers’ Act, 2019). Safe to say, the competition angle really doesn’t apply here.

Comments are closed.


Florida Politics is a statewide, new media platform covering campaigns, elections, government, policy, and lobbying in Florida. This platform and all of its content are owned by Extensive Enterprises Media.

Publisher: Peter Schorsch

Contributors & reporters: Phil Ammann, Jason Delgado, Renzo Downey, Rick Flagg, A.G. Gancarski, Anne Geggis, Joe Henderson, Janelle Irwin, Ryan Nicol, Jacob Ogles, Jesse Scheckner, Scott Powers, Andrew Wilson, and Kelly Hayes.

Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @PeterSchorschFL
Phone: (727) 642-3162
Address: 204 37th Avenue North #182
St. Petersburg, Florida 33704

Sign up for Sunburn