![fernandina beach marina cofb](https://floridapolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/fernandina-beach-marina-cofb-1280x719.jpg)
Pulling your boat into the Fernandina Beach Marina is going to get more expensive as the city works with its marina operator to cover increasing costs related to dredging and similar big-ticket items.
At the Fernandina Beach City Commission’s goal-setting session in January, marina representatives said they would come through with a revised rate structure to deal with costs, and the city received those proposed rates at the beginning of April.
“Oasis Marinas has conducted a study of rates both locally and throughout the (Intracoastal Waterway), to determine changes to the existing slip fee rate structure to accomplish this goal,” Oasis Marinas, the marina operator, stated in the letter. “Based on 2021 wet slip revenue, to generate an additional $200,000 per year, a minimum of 20% increase to user fees (slip rates) is necessary.”
The city Marina Advisory Board received the presentation at both its April and May meetings.
“Their recommendation was to move forward with the transient rates,” City Manager Dale Martin said to Commissioners at a meeting this week. “There were three options presented for long-term slip holders … and an increasing amount of revenue generated by those. The principal intent for the need for increased revenue is to support dredging operations, and also other capital improvements at the marina.”
On transient rates, peak season rates — April 1-June 15 and Oct. 15-Dec. 31 — go from $2.50 per foot per night to $3, which is expected to generate an additional $80,000 based on 2021 reservations. The weekly rate, offered year-round, goes from $12 per foot per week to $15. That is expected to bring in an additional $45,000. The monthly rate, offered during non-peak season, goes from $21.25 per foot per month to $30, which is expected to return an additional $20,000.
The Marina Advisory Board recommended Option B for long-term slip holders, who are charged per foot per month. Option A increased the rate from $19.25 to $22.25, while Option B raised it to $23.25, generating around $72,096 in additional revenue compared to $54,072.
Option C split the fee so recreational boaters’ rate increase would be to $20 and commercial to $30, which could have returned an additional $126,918 compared to 2021.
Based on those 2021 reservations, the transient rate increase coupled with Option B could generate an additional $226,696 at the facility over a year.
However, Commissioner Chip Ross made a motion to pass the resolution with language choosing Option C, which had an additional $281,518 projected over 2021’s numbers, though Commissioner David Sturges said he was more comfortable with Option B moving forward.
“We don’t have enough money. The marina is faced with — we have $715,000 a year in principal and interest. Right now, we’re paying $360,000 for wave action insurance, which is likely to go up,” Ross said.
“Then the third cost is dredging. Whether we get a dredging study or not, and it shows ways to reduce that (cost), we are going to need capital to institute whatever is recommended in that study.”
Commissioners voted 3-2 against Ross’ motion. Ross and Vice Mayor Len Kreger voted for it, while Mayor Mike Lednovich, Sturges and Commissioner Bradley Bean voted no.
The Commission pivoted and went with Bean’s motion of a $25 rate per foot per month for long-term slip holders, as opposed to any of the three options presented by marina management.
“We are increasing all slip usage by $5.75 per foot, which is midway between Option B and C,” Bean said. “That would result in slightly above a 25% increase, but it would be $103,000 and change.”
It passed 4-1, with Ross voting no.
One comment
Greg
May 7, 2022 at 5:40 am
From numerous reports, the electrical system at Fernandina Beach Marina is has been a huge problem with a number of boats sustaining damage. If this has not been fixed properly, the Commissioners of the City need to address that problem before any rate increases. If boaters don’t go there because of those problems, their “revenue projections” will be all wrong.
Comments are closed.