![fl-ne-cb-eight-broward-parkland-deputies-20190123](https://floridapolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/fl-ne-cb-eight-broward-parkland-deputies-20190123.jpg)
Attorney General nominee Pam Bondi told U.S. Senators she would work with lawmakers regarding gun policy mirroring Florida’s Parkland bill. But she didn’t commit to any specific proposal and stressed her own support for the Second Amendment.
She made remarks to Democratic Senators during a sometimes contentious confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla, a California Democrat, asked Bondi about Florida laws passed during her tenure as Florida Attorney General.
“In the wake of the Parkland shooting in 2018, you expressed support for certain gun control measures in Florida, including raising the minimum age for firearm purchases and implementing red flag laws, which I agree with and I support,” Padilla said. “They are proven to make a difference and to save lives. How would you use the position of Attorney General to advance these commonsense gun safety policies on a national level?”
He referenced a controversial law passed in the wake of the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High mass shooting, which resulted in the death of 17 people. After the tragedy, Gov. Rick Scott signed a gun control package raising the purchasing age for assault rifles to 21 and instating red flag laws that allowed for individuals’ guns to be seized temporarily if courts decide they pose a danger to themselves or others.
Bondi as Attorney General defended the legislation following a lawsuit by the National Rifle Association. Courts ruled the law was constitutional in 2020 after Bondi had left office.
In her confirmation hearing, Bondi stressed she has been a defender of basic gun rights.
“I have always been pro-Second Amendment,” she said. “I will follow the laws of my state of Florida and our country, of course, regarding any gun laws.”
But she recounted that during her time in office, she was on scene in the aftermath of the Parkland shooting and others.
“I worked that shooting, meaning I was there when 17 family members were notified that their children were murdered,” she said. “Also Pulse nightclub.”
In 2016, a gunman killed 49 people at Pulse, an Orlando gay bar.
“I also went to Nevada to help with the MGM shooting. The Attorney General at the time asked me to come out there,” she said. “I believe over 60 people were murdered there. I am an advocate for the Second Amendment that I will enforce the laws of the land.”
Padilla said he wanted to know if Bondi would back similar policies to those implemented in Florida and said he would like Congress to take up a federal red flag law and universal background checks.
“I would be glad to meet with you and review any legislation that you have, Senator,” Bondi said in response.
3 comments
Marc Remilard
January 15, 2025 at 5:41 pm
You neglected to mention that the District Court decision you linked to was upheld by a 3 judge panel of the 11th Circuit, but is still being considered by the full Eleventh Circuit. Oral arguments were in October 2024, so a decision could be coming at anytime that could overturn the law…or uphold the lower court decisions.
Bob Flesh
January 17, 2025 at 12:59 pm
I am retired now, but was a Detective Sergeant with the WPBPD and investigated many murders. THE MAJOR FAULT OF THE RED FLAG LAWS I KNOW ABOUT IS THAT INTENTIONAL OR ANONYMOUS FALSE REPORTING IS NOT SEVERELY PROSECUTED WHICH IS ESSENTIAL IF BOTH THE POLICE AND INNOCENTS ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DANGEROUS PHONY POLICE RAIDS.
Gary Manis
January 21, 2025 at 4:20 pm
Dangerous police raids enforcing red flag laws should not be happening, period. A notice requiring the person to either voluntarily surrender their firearms or appear in court to challenge the decision should be sent to the person via certified mail or hand delivered by someone from the sheriff’s department. Due process should be followed. These red flag notifications should be treated as tips only and a proper investigation should be done before even approaching a judge for action. Anything else would be a violation of the person’s rights.
Comments are closed.